Archive for the ‘Health’ Category

What Happens If Your Mother (Not Your Favorite Reality Star) Has Plastic Surgery?

Saturday, February 6th, 2010

Delia Ephron

Delia Ephron

Screenwriter, Playwright, Author

Posted: February 3, 2010 01:13 PM in HuffingtonPost.com

I haven’t been watching many reality shows lately because of the crying. There is simply too much of it. Last season on Project Runway, Christopher cried because he was sure that he was the only person in the world who would design a dress inspired by a rock (something I am sure he is wrong about). I have no idea how much crying there is on The Hills, since I was never a fan, but it did catch my attention in People magazine that Heidi Montag, star of the show, cried after she had ten plastic surgery procedures in one day. Heidi, I know from a quick Google search, is 23, although since her plastic surgery she looks 33. Which is actually something to cry about.

I have been interested in and done research on this subject spun slightly different: What happens if your mother (not your favorite reality star) has plastic surgery? This is the subject of my new novel for teenagers, The Girl with the Mermaid Hair.

If, as a teenager, you spend hours in front of a mirror deciding, say, whether one nostril is larger than the other or worrying whether your breasts point in different directions (typical teenage obsessing), do you outgrow this madness or make more radical choices if your mother comes home with larger lips, a smaller ass, a new chin, a different nose, bigger breasts? How do you feel if your mom suddenly doesn’t have any expression in her face? Or if you look into your mother’s eyes and no one is home?

Your main job as a teenager is to learn to love yourself. How can you do this if your mother hates herself?

In my research, what was so startling was how aware all the teenage girls were of their mother’s fear, or, more accurately, their hatred, of aging. One girl said, “Every time I wrinkle my forehead, my mother points it out and tells me not to. Even if I’m in the middle of a really important conversation.” Another spoke about “competitive dieting” with her mom, how she couldn’t help but engage in it even though she thought her mother’s obsession with fat was “crazy.” There is a study out this week from the Girl Scouts of the USA telling us what we already know, which is that the fashion industry and its use of ultra-thin models is making teenage girls too obsessed with being skinny, and distorting their body image. In my more limited unscientific research, the mothers are as strong an influence. Going on shopping trips with mom, usually a bonding experience, became all about hearing moms moan about their fat and rolls. Or seeing your mother trying on something, look in the mirror and say, “”I look ugly.”

I have vivid memories of my own adolescence when the main purpose of shop windows was not to see the clothes in them but my own reflection, when hours could be spent in front of a mirror deciding if my eyebrows matched. Emotionally, teen life is no different today, but now you can act on your own insecurities. You can fix them.

A lot of healthy acting out occurs in the mirror, as my research showed. Singing and dancing and even telling off people who hurt your feelings or trying on new identities. But there was also a lot of obsessing about body image. One girl got dressed using four mirrors, running from one to the next: one had good indoor lighting, one was a “skinny” mirror, one had natural light, one she could get the closest to. “If something is wrong with you,” a teenage girl said, “the mirror magnifies it.” Another said, “If I think something’s wrong with me, like my thighs are too fat, when I look in the mirror that’s all I see.”

God knows, I am not advocating growing old naturally, just to remember what a tender fragile time adolescence is. In my research, one teenage girl confided, “Seeing my mother after her surgery scared me to death.” We need our moms to be stable and secure. I have so many friends who will tell me with surprise, when looking at photos of themselves when they were younger, “Hey, I was really cute. I didn’t realize it.” No one does. You have to get older to realize it. Imagine if you got older and realized that you’d destroyed your younger self. You had operated it away.

Now that’s something to cry about.
Books & More From Delia Ephron
Frannie in Pieces (Laura Geringer B…
The Girl with the Mermaid Hair

‘i want my mommy!’

Monday, October 27th, 2008

Normally, this phrase is a desperate cry, often through tears, in times of frustration, sadness, fear, disappointment. From a little kid.

Now, it’s often a soft internal utterance. Just stating a fact. From the part of me who will always be your daughter. From the little me for whom you will always be ‘my mommy.’

When I want to ask you a question about something that happened, that no one else would know, to clarify my memories, I want my mommy.

When I feel a new appreciation for something you did or who you were, when I want to thank you, I want my mommy.

When I want to share, mother-to-mother, I want my mommy.

When my son does or says something I am proud about,  I want my mommy.

When I see the late autumn day sun illuminating wildly colored leaves, I want my mommy.

When I realize no one has critiqued the recording on my answering machine, I want my mommy.

When I want to revisit a conversation we had 45 years ago, I want my mommy.

I know, I know. I can speak to her. I can hear her. She is alive in me, certainly. In a way.

Still, I want to see her make a goofy face, hear her sing quietly to my son as he falls asleep. I want to hold her hand and play with it during services, hear her talk in funny dialects and watch her laugh till the tears come.  I want to see her (my) feet. I want to smell her skin, smooth her eyebrow with my finger, to give her head a scratch and scratch that same place on her back under the bra strap, to love her.

Still, I want to give you happiness. Make you happy. See you being happy. Give you love. Love you. Lay with my head in your lap, your hand stroking my hair. Get your love.  That unique, uplifting, universe-filling, life-saving love I always got, could only get, from You and Dad.

I want my mommy. I want my mommy. I want my mommy.

CONGRATULATIONS, GROOVY GIRLS!

Tuesday, June 3rd, 2008

img_0201

YOU GO, LADIES! Thanks for wearing WALKS THE WALKS tees, we’re so proud!

THE FOLLOWING is by TEAM CAPTAIN, LAURA RUSSO:

Imagine a woman…..

2 days and 40 miles. That’s right.
A group of good friends are working toward a common cause. Breast cancer effects all of us.
This past year has been my personal toughest. In Oct. 2006 my Mom was told her breast cancer had effected her bone marrow. All the years of chemo and radiation had altered her bone marrow and she was developing what looked like Leukemia. This was the first time she had to take a long term leave from work. She began staying with me more and more and that was an adjustment for everyone. I also ways told my Mom through all the ups and downs “Let me know when to worry” Well it was time to worry. We made the most of it. She had good friends come visit. She and another good friend were able to squeeze in a quick visit to the famous Mirival Spa between treatments. We went to a water park with all the grandkids. The main focus was lots of time with the family. Slowly her energy drained and she required more frequent treatments to maintain daily activities. She always could snuggle with the grandkids for a movie or story time. When she decided to stop treatment we all agreed with her decision. Luckily she did not suffer in the end and she died with the people she loved most around her on Aug. 5, 2007. Since then it has been a period of adjustment for all of us. The roller coaster continues. My goal with this walk to let her know that people are still fighting her amazing fight. Putting one foot in front of the other, just as she had to for so long. Another lesson I learned from her is the need to surround yourself with good people. Friends and family is what gets you through so thank you everyone. Thanks to the friends that listen to me then and now when I’m having a rough day. Thanks to the neighbors that pitched in with the kids when I had to run Mom to doctors appointments and when those appointments were no more. For those doing the walk with me, bring tissue, and for those donating, thank you. It really does take a village.
Laura

congrats to you all:

Laura Russo

Erin Ader

Jill Casey

Teresa Macdonald

Kathleen Pisterzi

Katie Pomroy

and THANKS!

Amie Russo

Three things.

Tuesday, June 12th, 2007

I spent a big chunk of yesterday and this morning with my old dear friend. Didn’t know til I got there (I flew) that she’s in a nursing home. That’s why there was no answer to all my calls lately. That, and because she ripped the phone out of the wall frustrated at not being able to get the words out of her mouth anymore.

The first thing: lifting her out of the chair back into the bed, helping her use the toilet and cleaning her afterwards, trying to move her into what looked like a more comfortable position on the bed, all those things were me and my mom all over again. Only– 10 years later. Used the same muscles. And the same state of mind.

The second thing: There was a kind of acceptance. An ‘it’s-what-it-is’ ness. Being present in the extreme. Without assessing, comparing to other times. Past or future. No self-consciousness. Just being with her. Now.
It had been like that with Mom. And that was an enourmous gift. Because somehow, i didn’t squander the those last few months i did have with Mom by not being other than fully with her.

And that leads me to the third thing: Now I get how a person could do hospice work. Without being torn up all the time. Not that sadness isn’t a part of death. But it’s not the only part. It’s not just about loss and what isn’t anymore. It’s its own thing. And every person is being– now and now and now. Til she isn’t anymore. The being may change, and not be what we would choose, but is there for the being with. Never before could understand how someone could actually choose to be with sick and dying people. And now I do. It’s just how you look at it.

Old, dear friend, I sure love you.

for those of us considering plastic surgery–

Friday, June 8th, 2007

Erma in Bomburbia

Tuesday, June 5th, 2007

TIME magazine, Monday, Jul. 02, 1984

For a survivor of housework and motherhood, laughter is still the best revenge

Notice: Car-pool moms entered in the U-Haul Mother-of-the-Year brake-off should complete the following literary quiz. Answers must be written in eyebrow pencil, and nuttiness counts,

1) For ten points, and a year’s supply of mental floss, what American philosopher, whose latest book has been ensconced on the New York Times best seller list for 40 weeks, described the stance of a pregnant woman as “like a kangaroo wearing Earth Shoes”?

2) Who first defined the contribution of American mothers to the psychological well-being of their children as “guilt: the gift that keeps on giving”?

3) From whom did Tocqueville, while touring American suburbs, steal his famous one-liner that “the grass is always greener over the septic tank”? Hint: Henry David Thoreau is a good guess, but wrong.

4) What noted existentialist and television celebrity, when asked in supermarket parking lots whether she is the legendary Erma Bombeck, blushes prettily, lowers her gaze and says, “No, I’m Ann-Margret, but thank you anyway “?

“I’ll be honest,” says Bombeck (for it is indeed she, the syndicated star humorist of 900 papers in the U.S. and Canada, and the baggy-toreador-pants clown of ABC’S Good Morning America), “when I started, I thought I was squirrelly. I thought it was just me. After the first columns, everyone on the block confessed it was them too.” Those early columns, written in Centerville, Ohio, back in the early ’60s, were not quite Corinthian, but they sure were Ermaic. Their message was that housework, if it is done right, can kill you. It was that the women who kept house in the happy hunting ground called suburbia were so lonely that they held meaningful conversations with their tropical fish. It was that “you become about as exciting as your food blender. The kids come in, look you in the eye, and ask you if anybody’s home.”

The message has not changed in substance, although many of the women she wrote about 20 years ago have gone on to divorces, master’s degrees and careers, and Bombeck and her husband are now the wealthy proprietors not of an $18,000 tract house near Dayton but of a lavish hacienda on a hilltop near Phoenix. “Women around the world are coming to the point where they are looking at their domestic situations and saying, ‘My God, I’m going crazy, it’s climbing-the-wall time,’ ” says Bombeck. She is 57 now (”somewhere between estrogen and death,” she mutters); her three children are grown and flown, and the elegant white walls of her fine house do not have crayon marks or grape jelly on them. But motherhood is a sentence without parole—have some guilt with your chicken soup; eat, eat!—and Bombeck and her fans have no trouble understanding each other. “I could move up to Alaska,” she says, “where the nearest neighbor is 300 miles away, get there by dog sled, walk into the cabin, pour a cup of coffee and then hear her say, ‘These kids are driving me crazy.’ ”

Dropping in is what Bombeck does. Three times a week in the newspapers, and twice more on television, she plays the nation’s dingbatty neighbor, who comes in the back door without knocking and cheers everyone up by saying, “Never mind the mess here, honey, let me tell you about world-class squalidness.” And then yarns away, maybe, about babies so wet that their diapers give off rainbows (a Phyllis Diller line she loves to steal). Or about her husband, the football watcher, who sits in front of the tube “like a dead sponge surrounded by bottle caps” until “the sound of his deep, labored breathing puts the cork on another confetti-filled evening.” About her schoolboy son who flunked lunch. About her washing machine, which eats one sock in every pair; her kids ask where the lost ones go, and she tells them that they go to live with Jesus. About how, when one kid ate an unknown quantity of fruit on a supermarket expedition, she offered to weigh him and pay for everything over 53 Ibs. About why it is all right to store useless leftovers in the refrigerator: “Garbage, if it’s made right, takes a full week.” About how young mothers want desperately to talk to someone who isn’t teething, and the woeful results when they try to generate conversation with those lumps, their husbands, by asking, ” ‘What kind of a day did you have dear?’ One husband reportedly answered by kicking the dog, another went pale and couldn’t find words, another bit his necktie in half . . .”

This is classic Bombeck, the wild exaggeration compressed into the stinging one-liner that only slightly overstates the awfulness of the truth. You don’t think husbands and kids are that bad? Listen, let me tell you about bad. “After 30 years of marriage, I felt like a truss in a drugstore window.” You think that’s-overstated? Let me tell you what it’s like to be a working mother, “racing around the kitchen in a pair of bedroom slippers, trying to quick-thaw a chop under each armpit . . .” Shared responsibilities? “Transporting children is my husband’s 26th favorite thing; it comes somewhere between eating lunch in a tearoom and dropping a bowling ball on his foot.” Listen, let me tell you. . .

Trench warfare of this kind is waged not against men and kids, but against loneliness and self-pity. The quick, hit-’em-again-with-another-joke style fits the desperate nature of the combat. The young mother who reads it may have a degree in psychology from Michigan State, but as she cleans up after the puppy while trying to separate two children who are fighting over a linty piece of bubble gum, she may not be in the mood for compound-complex sentences. She may smile over a column by Art Buchwald, the master of the discovered absurdity, or one of Russell Baker’s elegantly sane demonstrations that the world is crazy. But if she enlists in an army, it is likely to be Bombeck’s. Am I really down on the kitchen floor with an old pair of Jockey shorts doing this? Yes, and there’s Bombeck with pork chops under her arms. Such realizations (epiphanies, a James Joyce scholar would call them) explain Bombeck’s syndication in those 900 papers, the wild success of her seven books, and reader loyalty that does not stop short of fanaticism. No doubt they also explain her eight-year run on Good Morning America, where her appearances are consistently cheerful but not so sharp or funny as her columns. Bombeck’s fans want Bombeck, and they are prepared to excuse home movies.

Her self-caricature, the rhinoceroid slob in housecoat and curlers who hasn’t seen her feet since grade school, is not even a fun-house mirror image of reality. She is a good-looking, brown-haired woman (though the hair color varies according to whim) who is, if not gaunt, at any rate acceptably trim at 5 ft. 2 in. and 127 Ibs. Is it a surprise that her daughter Betsy, 30, and her sons Andrew, 28, and Matthew, 25, have lost their baby teeth? And that her husband is not a football-stupefied turnip but rather an articulate, quick-minded fellow? Bill Bombeck retired in 1978 after a successful career as a school administrator, and now manages their income of $500,000 to $1 million a year. He is more likely to be found jogging than watching the tube, and four years ago he ran the Boston Marathon in the creditable time of 3 hr. 29 min. Not all of the one-line zappers come from her side of the table; Bill will breeze into the house and announce with a big smile that he has just been to the library and that all of her books were in. She replies that he looked like a dead fish after his last road race and that he had better slow down. “You don’t understand,” she says. “I’m too old to shop around. You’re it.” The strong affection between the two is evident.

There is a hint of where the columns come from when Bombeck is persuaded to talk about herself. “My life story?” she says. “Fifteen minutes top. You’re looking at shallow. I’m just not that deep. You’re looking at a bundle of insecurity. I always think that everything good is going to evaporate and disappear overnight. I am the quietest person at the party. I position myself at the chip dip and don’t leave all night. I still have a very ordinary, simple person trapped in this rich, gorgeous, successful body.” The joke is practiced and sure, but she does not want her listener to miss her point, so she spells it out. “The whole thrust of my existence is that I’m ordinary.” It seems important to her to believe this. Another joking statement of the theme: “Everyone thinks of ordinary as some kind of skin disease.” Then she quotes the sort of thing she says when she gives a commencement speech: “Most of you are going to be ordinary. You are not going to the moon. You’ll be lucky to find the keys to your car in the back parking lot. But some of you are going to be great things to yourselves. You are going to be the best friend someone ever had . . .”

The journey that did not lead Bombeck to the moon began in Dayton, and the date could be set accurately enough as June 4, 1936. She was nine, and that was the day her father, a crane operator named Cassius Fiste, died of a heart attack at 42. “One day you were a family,” she recalls, “living in a little house at the bottom of a hill. The next day it was all gone.” The furniture, including Erma’s bed and dresser, was immediately repossessed, and her half sister went off to live with her natural mother. Erma and her mother, 25-year-old Erma Fiste, shared a bedroom in her grandmother’s house, and each day Mother Erma would get up at 5 a.m., fix breakfast for her daughter, see that she was dressed for school, and then leave in time to work the 7 a.m. shift at the Leland Electric factory. An adult observer would have seen a spunky young widow doing her best in bad times, but not until years later did Erma think of her mother’s tough-minded energy as wise or heroic. What she felt at the time was a daily desertion. When her mother married a moving-van operator, Albert (”Tom”) Harris, two years later, Erma gave him the classic drop-dead greeting: “If you think you’re going to take my father’s place, you’re crazy.” His attitude, she says, was “This kid needs sitting on.” Eventually Erma and Tom made their adjustment. The incredible self-centeredness of children, normal and natural but often savagely cruel, has been a consistent theme in her humor.

When her daughter showed signs of shyness and loneliness, Mother Erma signed her up for tap-dancing lessons as therapy, then took her to an audition for a Kiddie Revue at a local radio station. Erma stayed on the program for nearly eight years, tap dancing and singing. “She was quite a little hoofer,” says her mother, who still has Erma’s signed song sheets for On the Good Ship Lollipop and I’m Gonna Sit Right Down and Write Myself a Letter. Bombeck says it is obvious that the wrong Erma broke into show biz. When her mother, now a lively 73, began to appear with her on talk shows, Bombeck would tell the producers, “Don’t worry about Mamma not talking. Worry about her taking over the show.”

Which is exactly what she does. Mother Erma, who lives with her husband in nearby Sun City, admits that she “never had a sense of humor growing up. But as I get older, I get crazier. Me and Erma are both sort of silly together. The humor helped us to get closer. We began to see life as it is and not take it so seriously.”

At Emerson Junior High in Dayton, Bombeck started writing a humor column for a school newspaper called The Owl. Says Bill Bombeck: “The format hasn’t changed a lot. You’re talking about someone who has been writing a personal column since she was twelve or 13 years old.” Bombeck had been fairly offhanded about singing and dancing, but wising off in print was the best thing since soaping windows at Halloween. A couple of years later she was at it again, clowning about shoplifting, clearance sales and the lunch menu for the newsletter of Rike’s department store, where she worked to pay college expenses. “You can’t imagine how it fractured those people,” she says now. “I knew exactly what I wanted to do. God, I wanted to write. That’s all I wanted to do. I really loved the exaggeration. I still write about passing my varicose veins off as textured stockings.”

Her pursuit of a college education took her through uncertain territory. Middle-class teenagers of the time went on to college from high school the way they went to the drive-in for frozen custard and French fries. Everyone enrolled somewhere, and no one thought much about it. But Bombeck was working class, the first person in her family’s history even to graduate from high school. College was not seen as a necessity for many young women, or even as especially desirable. “Your goals were supposed to be modest,” she recalls. “If you were a girl, you either got a job and paid board, or you got married.” She took typing and shorthand at a vocational school and worked as a copygirl at the Dayton Herald to meet expenses. (Bill Bombeck worked at the morning Journal as a copy boy.) Erma saved enough money to begin courses at Ohio University, in Athens, but after a semester she was broke again. She returned to Dayton, got the department-store job and enrolled at the University of Dayton, the Roman Catholic school where Bill was a student.

Living at home and paying her own way, Bombeck made it through college in four years, including three sessions of summer school. The experience was not rich in what is usually thought of as college life, but she got the degree, and she did it on her own. In a second profound act of independence, she converted at 22 from the United Brethren Church to Roman Catholicism. “I saw something in it I wanted to have,” she says. “There is something very soothing about the whole thing. A love of God is easier for me to accept than the fear.” She remains a believer, who says, quirkily, “I never laugh when I pray. That’s God’s turn.” Like many Catholics, however, she is troubled by doctrinal issues affecting birth and reproduction. She agrees with the church prohibition of abortion but cannot accept strictures against birth control. “The group I ran with would have six, seven, eight kids and be drowning underneath. Let’s face it, the earth cannot afford this Catholicism.”

The Dayton Herald took on a gifted but erratic recruit after Bombeck graduated from the university. As a reporter, she recalls, “I was terrible at straight items. When I wrote obituaries, my mother said the only thing I ever got them to do was die in alphabetical order.” Even with her shorthand, she says, “I could never get the knack of listening and taking notes at the same time.” She would get excited and forget to write things down, and “everyone I interviewed ended up sounding like me. I did that with Mrs. Roosevelt and Mrs. Eisenhower.” The idea of Eleanor Roosevelt sounding like Erma Bombeck clearly had its bizarre appeal, but before anything truly lunatic could come of it, Erma quit the paper for good in 1953. She and Bill, by then a struggling high school social studies and American history teacher, had been married four years, and, she says, “I was sick of working. Putting on pantyhose every morning is not just whoopee time. My dream was to putter around the house, learn how to snap beans, put up curtains and bake bread.” The young couple adopted Betsy, and Erma, who had learned domesticity as a child, returned to the home, an event that was to prove only slightly less momentous than Douglas MacArthur’s return to the Philippines.

As everyone who has made the mad leap into parenthood knows, it is not the first child but the second whose arrival skews life into a grotesque caricature of its former civility. When Bombeck was several months pregnant with Andrew, the family moved to a tract development a few miles from Dayton that she was to satirize as “Suburbian Gems.” Its real name is Centerville. The Bombecks lived on Cushwa Drive (”probably named for some dentist”) in a house like all the others except for one prized interior feature, a $1,500 “two-way” fireplace, and on the outside, a front door they painted red so that Mother Erma and Tom Harris could find them when they visited.

None of the residents of Centerville, least of all the Bombecks, thought they were doing anything hilarious as they mowed their lawns and carted their kids to Cub Scout meetings. Bill tinkered around the house, and pieced out his teacher’s salary by painting houses and working at the post office on school vacations. Erma, he says, was always repainting or redecorating, moving the furniture around. There was, of course, a septic tank, and in the summer, says Erma, “you could see that little sucker sink into the ground and you’d think, ‘There goes another $400.’ ” But there weren’t many one-liners: “Who was there to listen?”

By an odd chance, the family in the house across the street was that of a young radio broadcaster, Phil Donahue, with five growing children. Donahue, an old friend now, whose morning TV appearances bring housework to a halt across the country, confirms that Bombeck was by no means the neighborhood clown. She and Bill, he says, were among the most hardworking of the development’s house-proud do-it-yourselfers. All the houses had Early American furniture, including the inevitable rocker with a cushion tied to the back. The idea of Bombeck as a hopelessly disorganized housewife “is, at the very least, highly exaggerated. When you went to Erma’s place, you never had to step over dirty underwear. At least in the evenings.”

The pressure that was to fizz through the crazy columns was building, however. Listen to Bombeck, who wanted to give her kids the secure childhood she had missed: “I was overwhelmed. You get from your mother what things should be. I’m killing myself. We all did. Are you ready for this? I’m sitting there at midnight bending a coat hanger, putting nose tissue on it to make a Christmas wreath for the door. You know what it looks like? It looks like a coat hanger with tissue that is going to melt when it rains. It’s a desperation you cannot imagine. I had a husband who worked at his job until 7 and 8 p.m. taking care of other people’s children. That’s when I remember reading Jean Kerr, who would sit out in her car and hide, reading the car-manual section on tire pressure. It’s ridiculous. The whole thing is ridiculous.” Then a deep breath: “It’s the core of laughter. If you can’t make it better, you can laugh at it.”

INSOMNIAC’s DREAM

Tuesday, April 24th, 2007

Like so many my age, i’ve become a horrible sleeper. My dr. perscribed something to help. and it does. still, i don’t like taking it. and, on a night i’ve had a drink or two, that is the worst: dehydration stings my parched mouth. I don’t know why i can’t sleep well, maybe it’s all the stuff running through my brain. It’s certainly not for lack of tirednes.
I made a valuable discovery this morning. First, I realized what a TERRIFIC NIGHT’S SLEEP i had last night. No Lunesta. no ’something+p.m.’ And this was the first time in months. Maybe years.

The night before last, i didn’t get to bed til 5, then woke at 6 to do my morning mom routine. I did my day on an hour’s sleep, with a nap during my son’s piano lesson.
so here’s the trick: to have a great sleep, JUST SLEEP EVERY OTHER NIGHT! I CAN’T BELIEVE I DIDN’T FIGURE THIS OUT EARLIER. the bonus is….all that extra stuff i can get done instead of everyothernight sleeping.
I hope you know i’m kidding. I’m sure there would be terrible long term effects from this plan. still, I certainly feel TERRIFIC this morning. and it was so so so nice to wake after a whole night of sweet, deep sleep. Just like a baby. Or at least, a me much younger than me.

we’re all multitasking, but what’s the cost? READ THIS NOW!!!

Monday, April 23rd, 2007

this, from the Los Angeles Times, july 19,2004:
We’re just not wired to do so much at once, as stress and mistakes show.
By Melissa Healy, Times Staff Writer

Executives revel in it. Parents with jobs and children rely on it. And circus jugglers make it art.

Multi-tasking, for most Americans, has become a way
of life. Doing many things at once is the way we manage demands bearing down on us at warp speed, tame a plague of helpful technological devices and play enough roles — parent, coach, social secretary, executive — to stage a Broadway show.
But researchers peering into the brains of those engaged in several tasks at once are concluding what some overworked Americans had begun to suspect: that multi-tasking, which many have embraced as the key to success, is instead a formula for shoddy work, mismanaged time, rote solutions, stress and forgetfulness. Not to mention car crashes, kitchen fires, forgotten children, near misses in the skies and other dangers of inattention.
So turn off the music, hang up the phone, pull over to the side of the road and take note: When it comes to using your brain to conduct several tasks at one time, “there is no free lunch,” says University of Michigan psychologist David E. Meyer. For all but the most routine tasks — and few mental undertakings are truly routine — it will take more time for the brain to switch among tasks than it would have to complete one and then turn to the other.When the two get squished together, each will be shortchanged, resulting in errors. And a prolonged jag of extreme multi-tasking, warns Meyer, may lead to a shorter attention span, poorer judgment and impaired memory. A Clint Eastwood fan and admitted poor multi-tasker, Dirty Harry, confronting his nemesis climactic scene: ” ‘A man’s got ” Meyer says, adding, “and that’s basically the deal with multi-tasking. If you try to go beyond them, you just screw yourself up royally.”

The term multi-tasking comes from the world of computers, where single-minded engineers could devise systems flexible enough to perform several tasks at once. But the proliferation of computers and
their spinoffs — mobile communications devices and hand-held gadgets — have made it necessary for their human users to multi-task as well.
For George Parsons, the founder and chief executive of Secorix Inc. in San Mateo, two desktop computers, a cellphone, a wireless computer device and an electronic pocket organizer pump out a vast and endless stream of demands, choices and information. A practitioner of Transcendental Meditation and a firm
believer in frequent visits to the gym, Parsons says he heads off meltdown by quieting his mind and escaping his gadgets several times a week. But sometimes, he says, his wife will call as he teeters on the edge of overload, and he’ll snap, hanging up on her with a brusque “can’t-deal-with-this-right-now!” dismissal. That’s when flowers are called for, he says.

In recent months, the public debate over multi-tasking has focused largely on cellphones and driving. On July 1, New Jersey became the second state —behind New York — to ban drivers from using a cellphone without a headset. Washington, D.C., has adopted a similar ban.

Meanwhile, in workplaces across the country, multi-tasking and its potential costs have become a prime concern for insurance underwriters, management consultants, efficiency engineers and cognitive scientists. In addition to contributing to communications lapses, rudeness and employee stress, multitasking is considered a factor in more serious workplace mishaps — from medication and treatment errors in hospitals to near misses in the skies. Indeed,
the Federal Aviation Administration has underwritten several studies to explore how air-traffic controllers, the multi-tasking virtuosos who orchestrate the nation’s air traffic, do what they do — and where their skills may break down.
The epidemic of multi-tasking even is sending patients to doctors and therapists with complaints of depression, anxiety, forgetfulness and attention deficit disorder. Mostly, says psychiatrist Edward Hallowell of Sudbury, Mass., they have a “severe case of modern life.” But their distress is very real, and their organizations are suffering too, he adds. “The more constant phenomenon is simply impaired performance and a workplace that becomes toxic in a hurry,” he says. “They may be meeting their numbers, but they’re not as creative, flexible, humorous or innovative as they might be.”

Cynthia McClain-Hill, a 46-year-old attorney, law firm owner, mother of two, wife and civic activist, multi-tasks with a vengeance. The Long Beach resident says it would not be unusual for her to be checking her BlackBerry (a portable e-mail device) while talking on the cellphone with the newspaper spread out on the passenger’s seat of her car (hopefully, she says, while stopped at a red light).
But the steel-trap memory that got her through law school without ever taking notes — and that helps her order dinner for her extended family without any prompting — is showing signs of wear and tear.
“I often find myself unable to remember my five phone numbers,” McClain-Hill says. “That’s one of my silent frustrations.” And there are more occasions now when she enters a room and realizes she has forgotten the purpose of the trip. For many women McClain-Hill’s age, such bouts of forgetfulness are attributed to age and the effects of changing hormones. Indeed, complaints of forgetfulness
among women in their 40s and 50s are so prevalent that Peter M. Meyer, a biostatistician at Chicago’s Rush University Medical Center, in the late 1990s conducted a study intended to gauge how deeply the hormone changes of menopause disrupt women’s memory.
Instead, he got a lesson on women and multi-tasking. The tests of short-term memory and verbal memory stubbornly showed that women of this age, though they complained of forgetfulness, were not missing a step. Their forgetfulness appeared to be a function of depression, stress and “role overload” — the multitasking
of many roles at once — Meyer concluded.

The ability to multi-task stems from a spot right behind the forehead. That’s the anterior part of the region neuroscientists call the “executive” part of the brain, the prefrontal cortex. When a human is assessing tasks, prioritizing them and assigning mental resources, these frontal lobes are doing most of the work, says Dr. Jordan Grafman, a neuropsychologist and chief of the National Institute of
Neurological Disorders and Stroke at the National Institutes of Health.
The same region of the brain is where we pull off another uniquely human trick that is key to multi-tasking: “marking” the spot at which a task has been interrupted, so we can return to it later.
The irony, Grafman says, is that the prefrontal cortex is the part of the human brain that is most damaged as a result of prolonged stress, particularly the kind of stress that makes a person feel out-of-control and helpless. The kind of stress, say, that you might feel when overwhelmed by the demands of multi-tasking.
Such stress, Grafman says, also will cause the death of brain cells in another region — the hippocampus, which is critical to the formation of new memories.
Damage there can hobble a person’s ability to learn and retain new facts and skills.
“Multi-tasking, almost by its very nature of course, creates stress,” Grafman says. And long-term stress, in turn, is likely to make us less able to multi-task, he says.
It’s a humbling lesson in the limits we face, he acknowledges. “If you’re multitasking, and it’s very stressful,” Grafman says, “you’re not going to get better at it.”

But you’re smarter than those being studied by psychologists and neuroscientists.
The ‘executive’ brain
You can navigate traffic, take a meeting by phone and stop at the dry cleaners along the way, right? Psychologist Yuhong Jiang is likely to deflate such confidence. She recently watched the working brains of students at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology as they tried to do two simple tasks simultaneously — identify shapes and identify either letters or colors. When students were shown the two tasks and instructed to do them at the same time, most shrugged and laughed. “They thought it would be easy,” especially with the half-hour of practice involved, says Jiang, co-author of the study published in the June issue of Psychological Science. But when it came time to perform under the scrutiny of a brain scanner, the subjects lost their composure completely, Jiang says. These students — among
the world’s brightest — “were getting very distressed,” she says. “They’d be hitting keys very hard and trying to figure it out. And they’d be committing a lot of errors…. And these were very, very simple tasks.”
When they were asked to switch between the two tasks, Jiang’s student subjects were a bit more accurate. But they were shifting very slowly between tasks — and the faster they were forced to toggle between the two tasks, the more they slowed down. When those who peer into the working brain see a person slow down the way these students did, they expect to see signs that greater
concentration and higher-level thinking have taken over. Neuroscientists expect, in short, to see the brain’s frontal lobes “light up” with activity.
But the shadowy images of these subjects’ brains at work told a different story. In between tasks, the part of the brain that prioritizes tasks and engages in higher-order thinking was taking a momentary rest. Like a dowdy family computer toggling between functions, the students’ frontal lobes effectively went blank, waiting for instructions for the next task to upload.
Madelyn Alfano, a soccer coach, volunteer and mother who owns 10 Italian restaurants scattered throughout Los Angeles, recognizes that feeling. Interrupted by a phone call during a recent meeting, she completed the conversation and walked back to the session — leaving her coffee behind and wondering along the way whom she had been meeting with and what the meeting was about.
When she sees that blank look on the face of an overworked employee, she tells him, “Go to the fridge, open the door, and think about why you’re here.” Then, she hands him a small spiral-bound notebook, like the kind she uses, to write it all down.
*
When he leaves his lab at Carnegie Mellon University, psychologist Marcel Just steers a wide path around motorists jabbering into cellphones. “I grip the steering wheel a little tighter and breathe lighter when they go by,” says Just, who has studied the brain science of multi-tasking extensively. Just is a believer in multi-tasking, and considers himself — rare among researchers in this field — pretty good at it. The brain, he contends, is a marvel of flexibility, and it is constantly multi-tasking. But even the human brain’s
resources are limited, and Just is under no illusions about the quality of the outcome when it does two or more things at once. When it does several tasks that involve conscious attention, the brain “discounts” the attention it applies to each. And, in effect, you get what you pay for, he says.
When a person multi-tasks well — without errors or disastrous results — it is usually because one or more of the tasks she is engaged in has become automatic. Humans, he says, can eat lunch and read the paper at the same time, because eating scarcely involves conscious thought. Some of us can transcribe a conversation and grasp its content as well because typing, for these people, has become a skill performed by rote.
Asked whether people can train themselves to become better multi-taskers, Just becomes philosophical. Yes, it should be possible, he says. But there will be a cost: A lot more of the tasks on which we now expend thought (or foresight or empathy or creativity) would have to be put on automatic pilot. We might be able
to do more, but we’d forfeit a lot of the subtlety and richness that comes with thought.
This, says psychiatrist Hallowell, is why those in the grips of multi-tasking often appear rude. Having put their communications skills on automatic pilot, “They start behaving like e-mail: impulsive, curt, abrasive, no lead-in, no small talk, no body language,” he says. Where creative rethinking might be the better approach to a problem, the multi-tasker will resort to routines and rote solutions.
And that, says attorney McClain-Hill, is when it’s time to stop. “I sometimes ask myself, ‘Am I able to look up and respond civilly to this person? Am I able to continue to bounce it back [to take a request and respond as necessary] — with a degree of ease and grace?’ If you can’t bounce it back,” she says, “you’ve got to immediately employ some measure to ease the stress, to step out of that traffic, to get a grip.”